Federal government figures gotten by The PIE program 62 % of applicants were declined a research authorization from January to July this year, with record-high volumes “raising immediate questions concerning transparency and application preparedness,” said ApplyBoard.
Regardless of a decade of fairly stable approval ratings floating around 60 %, rates have actually plunged to 38 % thus far this year, down from 48 % in 2024 adhering to the application of Canada’s research study license caps.
“It’s clear that Migration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is using far better analysis to brand-new applications,” Jonathan Sherman, vice head of state of sales & & collaboration at BorderPass told The PIE, indicating a “fundamental change” in government processing.


Indian pupils– who consist of 40 % of Canada’s international student populace — have actually been hardest struck by rising rejections, with four out of five Indian students getting rejections in Q 2 2025, according to BorderPass.
Stakeholders have indicated a twinkle of hope in general authorization ratings increasing decently this springtime, though without a “dramatic shift,” Canada will only get to one fifth of the federal government’s worldwide pupil target for the year, Sherman advised.
With institutions bracing for extreme declines, ApplyBoard evaluation has located one of the most usual factor for factor for rejection in 2024 was the understanding by IRCC policemans that students would not leave Canada after their researches, pointed out in over 75 % of situations.
“While customers at IRCC comprehend that some future students intend to obtain job experience in Canada after graduation … the substantial use of this reason last year recommends that several are viewed as having long-term residency as their primary function, rather than research study,” specified the record
Financial worries drove three of the top five rejection factors, after Canada more than doubled its proof-of-funds demands from $ 10, 000 in 2023 to $ 20, 635 in 2024
Specifically, in 53 % of situations, IRCC officers claimed they were unconvinced that candidates would leave Canada based upon financial assets, along with questions concerning insufficient sources for tuition and living expenditures.
“While brand-new plan caps played a role, our full-year information indicate repeating applicant challenges, especially around financial preparedness and immigration intent that are preventable with the best guidance and documents,” claimed ApplyBoard.
The report highlighted the continuing decline of undefined reasons for rejection, following IRCC including officer choice keeps in mind to visa rejection letters last month, which rated as a much-needed step in improving openness.
Other factors for rejection consist of the function of visit being irregular with a short-term keep and having no substantial household ties outside Canada.
The data comes in the middle of a major migration crackdown in Canada, with temporary resident targets consisted of in the most recent Migration Levels Strategy for the first time, which aims to lower momentary resident volumes to 5 % of the populace by the end of 2027– a year behind the previous government’s target.
Numerous are viewed as having long-term residency as their key function, as opposed to research study
ApplyBoard
Approval prices are likewise below par for various other temporary resident categories, however none so substantially as study allows, with just under fifty percent of all site visitor visas accepted until now this year, compared to a ten-year average of 64 %.
After more than 18 months of government plan turbulence, transforming qualification policies have most likely added to the rise in research authorization denial rates.
Stress to reduce IRCC stockpiles and reach enthusiastic government targets could also be playing a role, according to migration lawyers speaking with the Toronto Star
As of July 31, over 40 % of Canada’s immigration inventory was in stockpile, consisting of 56 % of site visitor visas, 46 % of job visas and 23 % of study visas, according to main information.
Adhering to a swathe of new IRCC officer works with, Sherman claimed he anticipated to see improvements in consistency, though “processing stockpiles might get worse before they get better,” he warned.
Amid the difficulties, teachers and advisors are increasing down on what applicants and establishments can do to make sure the very best opportunity of success, with ApplyBoard caution that any kind of insufficient or disqualified documents can be grounds for rejection.